Out of stock online. Not available in stores. Summary of Modern Romance: by Aziz Ansari and Eric Klinenberg - Includes Analysis Preview: Modern Romance is a nonfiction book by the At most reputable online dating services (not Tinder), you can filter from race, religion, and spiritual inclination; down to habits, ambitions, and geographical proximity. In fact, according to Aziz Ansari’s Modern Romance is a book that uses comedy and statistics to explore the current dating landscape in modern times. The author, Aziz Ansari, is an actor and comedian who ... read more
The cross-cultural comparisons feel a little clumsy in the book. More useful was the comparison of large cities to small cities in the U. Whatever your lens, it makes for an entertaining read. Sadiya Ansari is a Pakistani-Canadian journalist based in Toronto. She is not related to the author. Anyone can read Conversations, but to contribute, you should be registered Torstar account holder. If you do not yet have a Torstar account, you can create one now it is free.
Copyright owned or licensed by Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. To order copies of Toronto Star articles, please go to: www. close Sign In. search cancel. By Sadiya Ansari Staff Reporter Sat. Report an error. Journalistic Standards. About The Star.
If you do not yet have a Torstar account, you can create one now it is free Sign In. Conversations are opinions of our readers and are subject to the Code of Conduct. The Star does not endorse these opinions.
More Entertainment. Top Stories. I'm looking at you, dick pics! As Aziz points out, these stupid blunders just couldn't have happened 20 years ago. The point he makes is that the landscape for dating has changed And I'm sure it will continue to morph and alter into something unrecognizable in another 20 years. That's not necessarily a bad thing, at all. In fact, there are upsides searching for someone you connect with on a deep level, instead of settling and downsides expecting too much from one person, and not being satisfied when it comes to Modern Romance.
Admittedly, I had no real reason to want to read a book about dating. I'm not looking for love because I already had my very Unmodern Romance. We met at work, and talked on landline phones for hours! I simply wanted to take a peek at how the other half lives. And it was pretty enlightening! No, I don't feel sorry for the singles out there today. I don't think it's any harder, but it's definitely different for them than it was for me.
Every era has its own pitfalls, but in the end, I think we all want the same thing. flag likes · Like · see review. View all 39 comments. Apr 27, Kelly and the Book Boar rated it really liked it Shelves: liburrrrrry-book , funny-haha , read-in , non-fiction.
Quick confession — I never bothered reading the synopsis for this book. And not in a bad way either. Just kidding. Bet that got some of you who have accused Mitchell and I of being women haters here on Goodreads all worked up.
Basically, he proves in three pages that chicks and dudes are TOTALLY THE SAME when it comes to modern day relationships. Mmmmmmm, donuts. I confirmed that I could easily be transplanted to the s since I got married when I was a fetus instead of waiting until I was pushing 30 like modern-day women tend to do. Note: I am still holding out hope that Aziz will write a straight-up hilarious autobiography. View all 17 comments. Oct 06, Nandakishore Mridula rated it liked it Shelves: grchoice.
I got married in In India in those days, "love" marriages were still exceptions rather than the norm: when you had to look at the religion, caste, family background, and age of a possible partner who was to share your life divorces were absolute stigma! before hitching up, falling in love was like solving a mathematical equation with too many constraints. For a nerdy, uncouth, shy and bookish youngster who got tongue-tied in presence of a halfway-pretty girl, this was even more of a nigh I got married in For a nerdy, uncouth, shy and bookish youngster who got tongue-tied in presence of a halfway-pretty girl, this was even more of a nightmare.
Fortunately, as an educated young man from an aristocratic family, with a good job to boot, my prospects on the marriage market were bright. Like Mr. Bingley and Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice , mothers with daughters of marriageable age who knew my mother or father considered me as the rightful property of their daughters. Even though it gave my ego a sort of boost to be so sought after, in my heart of hearts I was intimidated by the thought of marriage.
On the one hand, I was an incurable romantic, always falling in love with a pretty girl and writing bad poetry; on the other, my cynical and sarcastic self continuously mocked me. So I shied away from all the proposals, giving the excuse that I was not ready.
One day in February , I went into my favourite bookshop and came across an unbelievable book sale where I picked up a bunch of absolutely awesome books for a pittance. I came home, drunk on my luck, when my mother told me that a marriage proposal had come from her classmate and close friend, for her daughter. I got it a couple of days later, just took one look at it, and fell head over heels in love. A meeting was arranged the coming week; we talked to each other for around 20 minutes and hey presto!
I was engaged. We got married that December. We have been together ever since. Aziz Ansari has done a wonderful job of explaining how the digital world has invaded the romantic arena. In olden days, the only hope of meeting a possible partner was out in the real world. If you were a caveman, you just banged the nearest attractive female on the head and dragged her into your cave: in more modern times, you met her in family gatherings, at the workplace and later on, in singles bars.
However, since you were geographically limited, there was a limit to your romantic territory. The upside? People got married with someone they found reasonably attractive and settled down. Now, with the advent of the internet, the sky is literally the limit. People can visit dating sites; with dating apps like Tinder, just swiping right on an attractive picture is enough.
If the other person also swipes right, you are practically hitched. This is happening a lot in India too. We have marriage sites where you can filter down the choices caste and state-wise, and pick up a romance which will be easily approved by family.
Talk about oxymorons! However, the downside of this infinite choice that one keeps on window-shopping. Less and less people settle down — they remain digital Casanovas throughout their life. The relative anonymity provided by computers have a helped a lot of nerdy types get in on the act: so while romance has flourished, marriage has taken a hit. And it does not help that even adultery has become easier with the advent of sexting! My main problem with this book is that Ansari continuously tries to do his stand-up comedy act.
It is not needed — the subject is fascinating by itself. And the jokes fall rather flat in the print medium, I must say. View all 54 comments. Apr 03, Clumsy Storyteller rated it it was amazing Shelves: humor , favorites , comedy , re-reading , reading-assingment , non-fiction. As a single woman I feel like Aziz Ansari knows my pain. Oh no, T As a single woman I feel like Aziz Ansari knows my pain. Oh no, Tanya has died. Their research program included focus groups and interviews with hundreds of people in big and small cities , They set up a discussion forum on the social networking websites, interviewed experts, consulted books on sociology, psychology and human behavior.
the book deals with online dating "As a public figure, I have never considered doing any online dating. I always figured there was a chance someone who was a stalker type would use it as an opportunity to kidnap and murder me.
FINALLY, I have a way to reach out to him and slowly plot his murder. He sends me a message pretending to be a woman. I see the profile. And the differences between marriages now and then, Emerging adulthood, and lots interesting things about dating in our technology-saturated age. View all 25 comments.
I am a satisfied single. Sorry person who said it. But I'm not holding my breath. Am I willing to spend hours and hours poring over profiles, reading messages from guys that I am a satisfied single. Am I willing to spend hours and hours poring over profiles, reading messages from guys that put little to no effort into writing them?
I have better things to do. But if I stumble upon my prince charming by chance? In Modern Romance, Aziz explorers and compares how people once found one another to how we painstakingly do today and he does a damn fine job of it. and noon. Yes, we looked this up twice. Our real-world selves and our phone selves go hand in hand. Act like a dummy with your phone self and send some thoughtless message full of spelling errors, and the real-world self will pay the price.
The person on the other end sees no difference between your two selves. Trying to impress me and this is what he put forth….. never mind that he never, not once, asked me a question about myself. There was a bunch of attempts before this but this is where I was trying to get him to have a conversation…. ask something…anything. Juzy tell me to go away. I have no idea if we have anything in common…. what do you think we might have in common?
What are your interests…. your views? Guy: Juzt looking for someone to someone to hang with. Nothing huge. Conversaytion share interest. Love the fsct ur artsy. U seem passionste bout what u do. And easy to look at. Im harmless. I dint bite I said something, then he sent this gem. Guy: I work afternoons during thr week. Love to do an art walk in lakrwood or something. Then walk the state park thete. Look, I suck at spelling, but I know for a fact that devices today help a person out with that problem.
In fact you would have to try pretty hard to screw up that bad. why even try at all sir if that is the best you can do? At least I hope so. But now we want our partner to still give us all these things, but in addition I want you to be my best friend and my trusted confidant and my passionate lover to boot, and we live twice as long.
So we come to one person, and we basically are asking them to give us what once an entire village used to provide: Give me belonging, give me identity, give me continuity, but give me transcendence and mystery and awe all in one. Give me comfort, give me edge. Give me novelty, give me familiarity.
Give me predictability, give me surprise. But a soul mate is a very hard thing to find. I was pleasantly surprised by how good this book was. View all 57 comments. Jul 07, Snoon Mcwilliams rated it it was ok. Startlingly inessential. Early on, Ansari makes a somewhat baffling statement that he felt compelled to write this book because there wasn't any other literature on modern dating culture-- a topic explored ad nauseum in newspaper thinkpieces, podcasts, and other disposable pop science bestsellers many of which he goes on to reference throughout the book.
He also mentions that he rejected the idea of writing a strictly humorous book because he feels like his stand-up is a more comfortable medium Startlingly inessential. He also mentions that he rejected the idea of writing a strictly humorous book because he feels like his stand-up is a more comfortable medium for his comedy ideas and only agreed to do the project if he could center it on serious sociological inquiry.
What results is a broad roundup of research studies on shifting attitudes toward marriage and dating, some case studies done through focus groups and Reddit, and a few interviews with social scientists. Unfortunately, the most acute problem with the book is that it's wholly free of any sort of insight or critique.
Have you ever thought about the fact that previous generations lived, loved, and died within a narrow geographic and cultural range while today technology allows us to learn about and connect with an almost limitless array of other people and ideas?
Would it surprise you to learn that some people in bygone eras felt stifled by limited options while others were content with what was available to them, while some in the current generation feel liberated and others feel paralyzed by choice?
It wouldn't? The flatness of the science could be forgiven if the book was funny, but it isn't. Ansari mostly limits himself to joking asides and even follows most of those up with qualifying statements that they're not meant to be construed as part of the research, as if he or co-author Eric Klinenberg were deathly afraid of being discredited by satirical factoids like saying 0.
What is the deal with that?? On the whole, his efforts to ground the book in sociological exploration torpedo the humor and the book ultimately doesn't succeed as science or satire. Save your time-- there's nothing insightful or memorable here at all. View all 12 comments. Nov 26, Elyse Walters rated it it was amazing Shelves: humor , non-fiction , romance , relationships.
At the beginning of the audiobook, Aziz joked with 'us listeners', about being "Lazy People" too lazy to sit down and read a book. He not only had to write the book, but now he 'had' to read it us us too! Aziz is entertaining and hilarious no questions about it. Love the guy! By the end of my 'lazy- listening' I came to the conclusion that Aziz brought playfulness and lightness to the game called "Modern Dating".
Listening to the different ways people interact through 'texting', opened up my eyes to the generation gap between - me, and my younger generation. I grew up talking on the telephone -- hours a night as a teenager. Every teenage girls dream was to own a princess phone of their own - next to their bed in the mid 60's. I talked with boys, girls, one on one , regularly. If a boy had interest in me he didn't send a text and say, "hey" or "hey, what's hanging?
be more direct such as, "hi, would you like to go to a movie with me on Friday night? Social connecting was either in person or on the phone. We didn't have instant messages- text messages to hide behind.
I was almost 'shocked' but not really , that Aziz was actually TEACHING basic appropriate communication -social skills of how to communicate just sending a text message without sounding like a jerk.
He was doing a great job with many terrific real- examples showing what worked and what didn't work. It's somewhat mind blowing to me that basic common sense skills need to be taught to young single men and women at all! AZIZ's refresher course is needed, no question about it. He also made it fun! Nobody gets called out -- this isn't a live seminar. When Aziz explored the changes of dating, romance , and marriage with the previous 50 years a couple of things stood out as interesting to me.
There was a high statistic of people marrying a person who lived in their neighborhood. It was common to marry a person less than 5 minutes from where you grew up.
When asked "why did you marry your wife? years ago: many of the answers were similar: "She was nice, we liked each other, and had common values". Today: when asked we hear answers like 1. He's the other half of me.. She's my soulmate. At the start of this book, I said to myself I can talk to my daughters about these issues ask them questions.. and happy In the middle of the book still enjoying this clever-wise-comedian, and his heterosexual pairing with graphs to boot I quietly said to myself YEP, STILL GLAD I'M MARRIED!!
At the end of the audiobook Having enjoyed a discussion about the beginning's attraction of a great relationship with lust and passion then moving into the companion phase which is next to follow if the couple stays together might a person move on to another person? Keep that 'Rush' and 'fire' hot? Science makes a good argument for the companion phase. To me, the dating world seems over- stimulating -- too many choices -to the point of maybe not really knowing anyone. Boy next door doesn't look so bad!
I'M 'still' happy TO BE MARRIED yet, I suppose there would be nothing worse if a person wished they weren't. I'm blessed in the marriage dept. and I'll be the first to say it. We are both independent - individual - complete whole healthy- soulful human beings yet we are emotionally connected with each other in the important areas of life.
I enjoyed my lazy time with Aziz. THANKS for reading your book to me Aziz. Aziz is a great walking buddy! You don't even need to text him for a date. Aziz's TV show "MASTER OF NONE", is funny, truthful as hell, with a great cast! flag 95 likes · Like · see review. View all 28 comments. Oct 24, Joe Valdez rated it really liked it Shelves: non-fiction , sociology.
Like every successful standup comedian today, Aziz Ansari was offered a book deal. Though Patton Oswalt did turn his offer into Silver Screen Fiend: Learning About Life from an Addiction to Film , Ansari's peers have largely released memoirs or joke books; even George Carlin wasn't above taking money that a publishing house was giving away and adding " New York Times bestselling author" to his accomplishments.
Winning the award for original thought, Ansari turned his offer into Modern Romance , a s Like every successful standup comedian today, Aziz Ansari was offered a book deal.
Winning the award for original thought, Ansari turned his offer into Modern Romance , a seriously amusing and documented sociological look at why with more options than ever, people feel more frustrated searching for a partner than ever. In collaboration with sociologist and author Eric Klinenberg as well as a football team of sociologists, research assistants and dating experts who consulted on data or organized focus groups, Ansari--born and raised in Bennettsville, South Carolina and at the time of his book's publication was 32, single, no children--is of course writing about himself just as much as his peers have in their books, but in analyzing why huge strides in civil rights and technology seem to have made the process of finding a mate more stressful, he's also writing about his audience.
Like me! In total, fourteen of the thirty-six seniors I spoke with had ended up marrying someone who lived within walking distance of their childhood home. People were marrying neighbors who lived on the same street, in the same neighborhood, and even in the same building. It seemed a bit bizarre. Did you ever think, Oh, maybe there's some people outside of my building? Why limit yourself so much? Why not expand your horizons? They'd stay there the whole night and have one or two drinks.
That seems more pleasant than what I see out in bars today, which is usually a bunch of people staring at their phones trying to find someone or something more exciting than where they are. In Alone Together Sherry Turkle tells the story of a young boy who had a standing appointment for a Sunday dinner with his grandparents. Every week, he'd want to cancel and his mom would tell him to call his grandparents and tell them he wasn't coming.
However, he never would, because he couldn't bear to hear the disappointment in their voices. If it were text, though, he'd probably wouldn't have thought twice about it.
As a medium, it's safe to say, texting facilitates flakiness and rudeness and many other personality traits that would not be expressed in a phone call or an in-person interaction.
These were women whom OKCupid had selected as potential matches for him based on his profile and the site's algorithm. The first woman he clicked on was very beautiful, with a witty profile page, a good job, and lots of shared interests, including a love of sports. After looking it over for a minute or so, Derek said: "Well, she looks okay.
I'm just gonna keep looking for a while. I couldn't believe how quickly he just moved on. Imagine Derek of twenty years ago, finding out that this beautiful, charming woman wanted to date him. If she was in a bar and smiled at him, Derek of would have melted. He wouldn't have walked up and said, "Oh, wait, you like the Red Sox? No thank you!
But Derek of just clicked an X on a Web browser tab and deleted her without thinking twice, like a J. Crew sweatshirt that didn't live up to his expectations upon seeing a larger picture. His parents both work in media, and every year he goes to the Westminster Dog Show at Madison Square Garden and finds his way backstage through a combination of walking with a purpose and flashing media credentials his parents help with. Talk about impressing a first date! We then bought wine, which they served out of sippy cups, and made a drinking game out of the dog show.
Take a drink every time a dog jumps when it's not supposed to, and so on. Dating aside, I'm definitely playing a Westminster dog show drinking game ASAP.
That sounds fun! One woman told us: "In college, my boyfriend broke up with me by changing his Facebook status to single. We got back together six years later, and then he broke up with me over text message. I should probably stop dating him. Aziz Ansari reminds me of a bright younger brother, or perhaps energetic cousin, who you enjoy having around but at some point--maybe every hour, depending on what he's drinking or ingesting--you feel like telling, "All right, settle down, settle down.
In addition to traveling to Tokyo and Buenos Aires for a look at two of the most extreme dating climates in the world--one where men have their libidos set to 1 and another where masculinity is cranked up to I got the most value from the focus groups with senior citizens. I could easily see this book being expanded into a television program, where Ansari meets people of different groups in different cities to talk about romance. It's colorful, analytical and thought provoking, whether you're single like me, or in a committed relationship and curious what's going on out there, the same way I enjoy watching nature programs though I'm uninterested in hunting game on the plains.
My experience with modern romance is we do have so many choices and are in such a hurry to find the One but that the relationships that have been most memorable for me were those where I took the time to get to know someone in spite of ourselves. The Internet can so easily reduce the process of meeting people to ordering patio furniture, but people are not products, and my most meaningful relationships have been with women who weren't my "type" and vice-versa. Somehow we unplugged ourselves from the matrix and made a connection, but it's not easy.
It makes me appreciate those relationships I've had so much more. This thoughtful and fun book reinforced that. Length: 59, words flag 80 likes · Like · see review. View all 35 comments. Nov 05, Diane rated it really liked it Shelves: audiobooks , nonfiction , humorous , sociology-psychology. Aziz Ansari is a funny guy. I've enjoyed his work as an actor and a comedian, so I shouldn't have been surprised when I really liked his book.
But I was surprised, especially when I learned that he had teamed up with a sociologist and did actual research on modern romance. Aziz was interested in how technology has changed dating culture, and he opens the book with a funny story about a girl, Tanya, who didn't text him back after he had asked her out. He realizes that texting and social media and Aziz Ansari is a funny guy. He realizes that texting and social media and dating apps and emojis have become increasingly important in dating and relationships, and he and a sociologist set out to research the subject.
For example, they conducted interviews with people from a wide variety of ages and backgrounds, and they even traveled to other countries to get some international data on romance. One aspect of their research I found especially interesting was that online dating sites and apps, such as Match.
com and Tinder, have dramatically increased the number of options for people, but having so many choices can be overwhelming. It makes it harder for some people to choose someone, because there are always more profiles to check.
One woman told the story of how she would check Tinder before going a date, just in case she saw someone more interesting than the guy she was supposed to meet. I also liked the perspective of elderly folks who were interviewed. Overwhelmingly, the women who got married young wished they hadn't been pressured to find a husband so quickly. Even in cases where the women had relatively happy marriages, they felt a sense of loss because they didn't get a chance to experience being single in their 20s, or have time to live independently, without relying on a parent or a husband to support them.
I love sociology, and I thought this book was a delightful blend of Aziz's humor and sociological insights. I listened to this on audio, and Aziz was a very funny performer. He had me laughing within the first minute, and this book made a long road trip seem very short. I would recommend it to anyone interested in the sociology of dating, or who also wants a good laugh. flag 75 likes · Like · see review. View all 8 comments. Jun 19, emma rated it really liked it Shelves: recommend , owned , nonfiction , reread , reviewed , 4-and-a-half-stars , non-ya , funny , authors-of-color.
i posted, i posted, i posted! plz be proud of me. Can anyone blame me? What a track record. I could never claim to be unbiased on this subject. part of me now. I am destined for an existenc i posted, i posted, i posted! So now that you know I cannot be trusted, we can get into this. This is, by the way, contrary to my typical off-the-charts levels of trustworthiness. First: GO WITH THE AUDIOBOOK. Now, you may be thinking, Emma, despite your claims of general trustworthiness, I do not trust you.
I do not listen to audiobooks; I prefer Books with Pages. That is why I am here, on this site, generally dedicated to Books. With Pages. And I hear ya, voice-of-an-imaginary-reader-that-is-becoming-a-motif-in-my-reviews. Previously, I was just like you.
Insert gasp from the crowd here. audiobook credits to my name. And that they would be expiring shortly. And so I lived my best extreme-couponer life, and posted a status asking for recommendations.
Sofi came THRU. WHICH WAS THE RIGHT CHOICE. Thanks again, Sofi. In my initial review, I gave this book three-ish stars. Because he reads it. And riffs. And jokes about the laziness of audiobook listeners. This is particularly fabulous for me, as someone who read the book first, because I get to laugh pretentiously and condescendingly - which is my favorite kind of laughter. The whole thing is great and I love it so much.
And on TOP of it, discuss the history of romance and the changes that led us here. They had to place some limits on it. Unfortunately, these limits mean we mostly hear about the Tinder-esque romances formed by straight American twentysomethings.
But I understand the need to focus on a niche. Klinenberg and Ansari visited several other countries to try to get a more global concept, and IT. Honestly I want the two of them to write a million books like this. Just explain every aspect of society and culture to me via six-hour audiobook, Aziz. So that was a lil upsetting. Bottom line: THIS IS SO FUN, but you gotta try the audiobook.
i don't think i was alone, however, in expecting a little more aziz in it. all in all worth it, though! flag 69 likes · Like · see review. View 1 comment. Aug 07, Sarah Jane rated it really liked it. I think Aziz Ansari just convinced me to get on Tinder? flag 71 likes · Like · see review.
View all 3 comments. Dec 16, Philip rated it really liked it Shelves: nonfiction , contemporary , releases , author-of-color , biography-autobiography , author-man. Do not feel obligated to read it in its entirety, but c'mon it's kind of entertaining. Surprisingly not as funny, but much more insightful than I expected. I guess I figured this would be Master of None in book form with Ansari chronicling specific experiences he's had that reflect dating culture today. Don't get me wrong, there's plenty of humor, and Ansari does throw in a few auto-biographical accounts, bu 4ish stars.
Don't get me wrong, there's plenty of humor, and Ansari does throw in a few auto-biographical accounts, but it ends up being more of an impressive examination, complete with sociologists, research studies, etc. This is compared with norms of the past, showing the way changes in society and technology have shaped the evolution of modern romance.
I'll give you a little glimpse into my humdrum relationship history as I detail my exploits as they apply to some of the points made in this book, and you can compare with your own. This was at the end of my junior year of high school - we were in volleyball class together, she asked me to the "girls pref" dance, we held hands, and after a few weeks of hanging out, during which time we made it "official," I had my first kiss at It took me 30 minutes of awkwardly lying silently next to her at a park knowing full well she expected me to kiss her, but being too scared to dive in, before I finally bucked up the courage and gave her a fairly chaste kiss.
Having gotten the hard part out of the way, I went in for a second, at which point she sucked me in, tongue and all. Her first words afterward were "you should open your mouth more. When asked how many girls I had kissed, I replied "just a few. After a brief period of bitterness, we remained good friends.
A few years later, her boyfriend at the time left the country for a while, and since we were good friends , we would hang out together. In her bed. Until after watching a particularly emotional episode of One Tree Hill we ended up having a NCMO non-committal make out until she started crying. Our tryst ended shortly after.
Relevant points: - This was Mobile phones and texting had just started becoming accessible and prevalent among younger common folk like myself. Texting was T9 and I had to monitor my activity because unlimited texting wasn't an option for anyone but the high class.
I remember texting being so cool at the time. It hadn't yet taken over lives and transformed communication but it was novel and exciting chatting with friends even if there wasn't much substance beyond "hey wassup" "im good u?
So I never actually experienced dating without cell phones and texting. A couple years earlier, right before starting high school, I moved to a different state and these were the only easy ways to keep in contact with old friends.
AIM chat rooms could also be utilized as cesspools for carnal desire, internet sex, and the dawn of catfishing, but that wasn't my style. Myspace was a serious thing and I seem to remember it as being considered kind of edgy at first. My parents refused to let me get a Myspace so I had to keep mine secret. Again, it was fun to connect with friends, post comments, expect replies, and cause scandals based on who was selected as a "top eight friend" or whatever it was.
It was also used by some as a way to hook up. Similarly, I eventually didn't want to be with her anymore, but didn't have the guts to say so and breaking up over text would have been seriously uncool. So I ignored her texts until she forced my hand. I am not proud of myself. I also couldn't decide whether I should have felt guilty about making out with her while her kind-of boyfriend was in another country.
So the opposite of me. But I kind of became social by association? We had people over all the time and somehow I became kind of cool because my house was the cool place to be. I had a fairly wide circle of friends and Mildred somehow entered that circle despite her being way out of the circle's league. She was not even on my radar until I realized we were flirting a lot and she was giving me a lot of signs and making it really easy for me to ask her out.
I was a giant dork, and ridiculously immature, while she had poise and beauty and confidence, so it was inevitable that things wouldn't last long. I tried so hard to be "romantic" and to make things special, so even after we were "official," I didn't even kiss her for a long time because I was waiting for the perfect Hallmark moment. In hindsight this was stupid and naive and I wish I would have moved things a lot faster. After three months my longest relationship until marriage , she ended things very maturely, in person, while I was completely oblivious to the fact that our relationship had been gradually declining for a while.
She gave an excuse that I could never determine the legitimacy of, and let me down gently by suggesting that we "take a break," leaving a hypothetical door open, even though we both knew the door would never be used again. We remained friends and continued to hang out in the same crowd.
Relevant points: - Of course smartphones were a thing at this point. Social media could be accessed at any second and the obsessiveness with likes and comments began.
Texting had become my preferred mode of communication; I had conversations of increasing depth and took my time crafting the perfect messages. I also started playing the game of not texting back for the same amount of time it took to receive my last reply. I never answered calls unless it was family, or I was expecting a call, and even then preferred to ignore calls and text back instead.
It all went downhill from there. Everyone I told this to was shocked that he had taken things so far. I remember posting things on other people's Facebook walls that I never would have in person, or even through text. Something about it being open and public made it easier, less intimate. Snapchat was the newest thing and word on the street was that it was used mainly to send dick pics. Of course, they all cost money and I was a starving college student, so this never went anywhere.
I had a legitimate conversation with maybe one person but it ended quickly. I didn't understand how dating sites could be successful for so many people. I decided that I could probably only ever date someone with whom I was already friends. Blind dates were all duds so I felt like I would need to have some kind of existing relationship in order for things to progress to a relationship. I lucked out by having such a social roommate through whom I became friends with so many people.
Game changer. I ended up going on a ton of Tinder dates around this time. While simultaneously being embarrassed that I was going on a ton of Tinder dates, and making up creative alternative meet-cutes. I only ended up going on multiple dates with a handful of girls, and only one or two matches in particular turned into relationships but they were fairly solid by my standards.
Betty came about during a time when I was trying hard to go on second dates with these Tinder girls. I figured I had to give them second chances because it's hard to get to know a person in an hour or two, especially when the only thing you know you have in common is that you both liked the other person's idealized presentation of themselves.
Betty evolved from a typical Tinder girl that I didn't feel much chemistry with, to a full-blown relationship. I'm almost ashamed to admit that one of the biggest factors that led to our breakup was that she lived like 30 minutes away and I didn't want to drive out to see her. We'd switch off driving to see the other person so I only had to drive down once a week or so but I decided it wasn't worth it. Apparently the most attractive quality in a woman for me was close proximity?
In other news I finally had the guts to break up with her myself, in person even, at a Cafe Zupas. Relevant points: - Up until Tinder, I relied on my friends to set me up on dates or to bring new people into our social circles that I could get to know.
I felt like I burned through all of those options pretty quickly and didn't know how to meet new people. Through Tinder I connected with a lot of girls. It was brilliant. Look at someone's picture and a short blurb of how they describe themselves and make a snap judgment about whether you're interested or not.
Basically the dating equivalent of Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. The beauty was that so many people were using it that I could never run out of people to swipe through. The downside was that all of the girls who I matched with who I thought were my type lived in the college town 30 minutes away with Betty. I still felt obligated as the dude to initiate the follow-up, but unless I was feeling it I wouldn't contact the girl again and that was that.
On the rare occasion a girl texted me after a date and I wasn't interested, I told them so, but otherwise never talked to the girls I didn't connect with again. That I would never have a healthy relationship until I opened up and allowed a legitimate connection to develop. Wise words. We never talked again but never actually deleted each other from social media, and I occasionally stalked her to see how she was getting on. She's now married with a kid whose face I would occasionally see on Facebook.
Isn't that so lame and old-fashioned? My church does this thing where they set up congregations entirely composed of young, single adults, seemingly in an effort to get us to marry each other. I always thought it was ridiculous and incestuous to date people in my surrounding neighborhood, who I would otherwise see on a regular basis.
Not to mention how dated and close-minded I thought it was to only go out with people of my own religion. I had a strict policy against dating people from church.
I attended for the religious aspect and because my friends went. Also, Stacia and I did not have good first impressions of each other. I was still living with my social friend and we still had regular gatherings that led her to believe that I was a cocky douchebag who had girls fawning over me.
Eventually our circles of church friends overlapped and we became comfortable with each other. She realized I was a doofus, not a playboy, and in turn assured me that those guys who claimed to have hooked up with her only wished they could have, that she would never have actually given them the time of day. We grew to greet each other, tease each other, give each other dating advice, and set each other up with our friends.
Then it was like a switch flipped. All of a sudden I realized I was in love with her, and as luck would have it, she had the same epiphany at the same time. We dated for six months before I proposed and were married six months after that.
Almost three years on, I love her now more than ever. Final thoughts: - Obviously I ended up marrying someone I met IRL.
We would text each other occasionally while we were dating but it was mostly to figure out when we'd see each other next.
I never really dated for fun, I dated to get into relationships. I never even kissed girls until I felt like we were sufficiently serious. I'm pretty sure I'm quite anomalous in that regard. Looking back would I have done anything different? Oh yeah. I would have had way many more NCMOs. I think I missed out on a lot during my single years by being so rigid.
I still can't bring myself to accept the idea of being in serious relationships with multiple people at the same time, but I feel like there's no harm in going on dates with lots of people until someone special emerges. I'm fine with it, and luckily, it ended up working for me. It's interesting looking back, pondering these things, and comparing my ideas then and now to the ideas expressed by people in this book. If nothing else, it's insightful in that regard and makes me want to force it on my single friends.
Philip's Library flag 64 likes · Like · see review. View all 19 comments. May 25, Glenn Sumi rated it liked it Shelves: non-fiction. Modern Romance is about dating in the digital age. Getting to know people has evolved significantly even over the past few years. Dating sites, swipe apps like Tinder and sexting are a far cry from how people used to meet — you know, through friends and family; answering personal ads; video dating, where you watch potential partners' VHS tapes!
Ansari has teamed up with NYU sociology professor Eric Klinenberg for the book, so there are many quotes from experts and plenty of facts, figures and even some graphs. There are also lots of jokey elements, like dorky photos Ansari imagines what his online stalker looks like and fake footnotes okay, I laughed at a silly Betty Friedan footnote.
A few years ago I saw Ansari perform live, during the time he was doing research. He draws on some of those exchanges from that tour in the book. Note: Aziz admits at the outset that the book is primarily about heterosexual relationships and most of the research was done with middle-class people.
But by far the most fascinating sections in the book are about dating practices in other countries: Qatar, Japan, France. Aziz jokes that he chose many of these cultures for their culinary offerings, but there are some sharp observations here. People in Japan are so private they often use a pet — or an inanimate object, like their RICE COOKER! And the section on France opens up a big issue about monogamy and open relationships. You know who also weighs in on open relationships?
The hip-hop star Pitbull. Ansari also chronicles his own relationship history, which has gone from single to dating to seriously dating. So there are plenty of happy endings. Um, you know what I mean. flag 61 likes · Like · see review. View all 10 comments. Mar 03, Carmen rated it really liked it Shelves: he-says , book-lover-s-desk-calendar , non-fiction , published , traditionally-published , american-author.
CALLING VS. TEXTING "A phone call? The WORST. Generally, younger dudes were FUCKING TERRIFIED of calling someone on a phone. This didn't surprise me that much, but I was surprised that younger women also expressed terror at the CALLING VS. This didn't surprise me that much, but I was surprised that younger women also expressed terror at the thought of a traditional phone call.
Other girls thought it was just too forward for someone to call as the first move and said that a text would be more appropriate in general. However, other women said receiving a phone call from a guy showed he had confidence and helped separate those men from the pack of generic "Hey wsup" texts that normally flood their messaging programs.
To these women, the guys who call seem brave and mature. The phone conversations helped create a rapport that made them feel comfortable and safe enough to go out with a person they didn't know all that well. A woman who came to one of our focus groups discussed how she got so fed up with text messaging that she cut of her texting service and could only be reached by phone calls. This woman never went on a date with a man again.
No, she actually started dating someone soon afterward. She also claimed the guys who did work up the courage to call her were a better caliber of man and that she was, in effect, able to weed out a lot of the bozos. But with some women who loved phone calls, things weren't that simple. In a rather inconvenient twist for would-be suitors, many said they loved phone calls - but had no interest in answering.
For this group, voice mails provided a screening system of sorts. When they explained this, it made sense to me. If the message was from someone they'd met briefly at a bar, it let them hear the guy's voice and made it easier to sort out the creeps. One girl raved about a nice voice mail a guy had recently left her. I kindly requested she play it and heard this gem: "Hey, Lydia. It's Sam. Just calling to say what's up. Gimme a ring when you get a chance.
I pleaded to know what was so great about this. She sweetly recalled that "he remembered my name, he said hi, and he told me to call him back. Name, hello, please call back. Not really a boatload of charm on display. To fail this test, a guy would have to leave a message that said: "No greeting.
This is a man. I don't remember you. End communication. I'm not here to judge Ansari as a human being, just review his book. It's not my place to judge the living and the dead. That being said, I want to state that I can't think of Ansari without being mildly sick to my stomach. Before I had absolutely zero feelings about Ansari whether positive or negative, and now thinking about him makes me slightly nauseous.
I simply want to make it clear that although I would love to say I completely was able to separate Ansari's actions from his book, I was not able to do so. I think especially jarring in the case with Ansari is that he seemed in the book to be sympathetic to women and understanding of women and not like someone who would pressure you into giving him a blowjob and shove his fingers in your mouth.
I mean, he LITERALLY wrote a book on dating in which he explains to men that they should be kind to women. It's not like he wrote a detective novel, or something. On to the book.
By aziz ansari. My parents had an arranged marriage. This always fascinated me. He quickly deduced that she was the appropriate height finally! They decided it would work. A week later, they were married. And they still are, 35 years later. Happily so—and probably more so than most people I know who had nonarranged marriages. First I texted four friends who travel and eat out a lot and whose judgment I trust.
I checked the website Eater for its Heat Map, which includes new, tasty restaurants in the city. Then I checked Yelp. Finally I made my selection: Il Corvo, an Italian place that sounded amazing.
Unfortunately, it was closed. It only served lunch. At that point I had run out of time because I had a show to do, so I ended up making a peanut-butter-and-banana sandwich on the bus. The stunning fact remained: it was quicker for my dad to find a wife than it is for me to decide where to eat dinner. This kind of rigor goes into a lot of my decisionmaking.
If this mentality pervades our decisionmaking in so many realms, is it also affecting how we choose a romantic partner? The question nagged at me—not least because of my own experiences watching promising relationships peter out over text message—so I set out on a mission.
I quizzed the crowds at my stand-up comedy shows about their own love lives. People even let me into the private world of their phones to read their romantic texts aloud onstage. Throw in the fact that people now get married later in life than ever before, turning their early 20s into a relentless hunt for more romantic options than previous generations could have ever imagined, and you have a recipe for romance gone haywire.
In the course of our research, I also discovered something surprising: the winding road from the classified section of yore to Tinder has taken an unexpected turn.
Our phones and texts and apps might just be bringing us full circle, back to an old-fashioned version of courting that is closer to what my own parents experienced than you might guess. Almost a quarter of online daters find a spouse or long-term partner that way. It provides you with a seemingly endless supply of people who are single and looking to date. Before online dating, this would have been a fruitless quest, but now, at any time of the day, no matter where you are, you are just a few screens away from sending a message to your very specific dream man.
There are downsides with online dating, of course. Throughout all our interviews—and in research on the subject—this is a consistent finding: in online dating, women get a ton more attention than men.
Even a guy at the highest end of attractiveness barely receives the number of messages almost all women get. On the Internet, there are no lonely corners. Take Derek, a regular user of OkCupid who lives in New York City. Medium height, thinning brown hair, nicely dressed and personable, but not immediately magnetic or charming.
At our focus group on online dating in Manhattan, Derek got on OkCupid and let us watch as he went through his options. The first woman he clicked on was very beautiful, with a witty profile page, a good job and lots of shared interests, including a love of sports. Imagine the Derek of 20 years ago, finding out that this beautiful, charming woman was a real possibility for a date.
If she were at a bar and smiled at him, Derek of would have melted. No thank you! But Derek of simply clicked an X on a web-browser tab and deleted her without thinking twice. Watching him comb through those profiles, it became clear that online, every bozo could now be a stud. But dealing with this new digital romantic world can be a lot of work. Even the technological advances of the past few years are pretty absurd. Trust me! In the history of our species, no group has ever had as many romantic options as we have now.
In theory, more options are better, right? We have all become maximizers. When I think back to that sad peanut-butter-and-banana sandwich I had in Seattle, this idea resonates with me.
You better believe. If you only knew how good the candles in my house smell. If you are in a big city or on an online-dating site, you are now comparing your potential partners not just to other potential partners but rather to an idealized person to whom no one could measure up.
Amarnath Thombre, Match. When you watched their actual browsing habits—who they looked at and contacted—they went way outside of what they said they wanted. When I was writing stand-up about online dating, I filled out the forms for dummy accounts on several dating sites just to get a sense of the questions and what the process was like. The person I described was a little younger than me, small, with dark hair. My girlfriend now, whom I met through friends, is two years older, about my height—O.
A big part of online dating is spent on this process, though—setting your filters, sorting through profiles and going through a mandatory checklist of what you think you are looking for. People take these parameters very seriously. But does all the effort put into sorting profiles help?
Despite the nuanced information that people put up on their profiles, the factor that they rely on most when preselecting a date is looks.
Now, of course, we have mobile dating apps like Tinder. Contrary to the labor-intensive user experience of traditional online dating, mobile apps generally operate on a much simpler and quicker scale. As soon as you sign in, Tinder uses your GPS location to find nearby users and starts showing you pictures. Maybe it sounds shallow. But consider this: In the case of my girlfriend, I initially saw her face somewhere and approached her.
I just had her face, and we started talking and it worked out. Is that experience so different from swiping on Tinder? Nor is it all that different from what one friend of mine did, using online dating to find someone Jewish who lived nearby. In the U. Americans are also joining the international trend of marrying later; for the first time in history, the typical American now spends more years single than married.
So what are we doing instead? As Eric wrote in his own book, Going Solo , we experiment. Long-term cohabitation is on the rise. Living alone has skyrocketed almost everywhere, and in many major cities, nearly half of all households have just one resident. But marriage is not an altogether undesirable institution. And there are many great things about being in a committed relationship. Look at my parents: they had an arranged marriage, and they are totally happy.
I looked into it, and this is not uncommon. People in arranged marriages start off lukewarm, but over time they really invest in each other and in general have successful relationships. This may be because they bypassed the most dangerous part of a relationship. In the first stage of a relationship, you have passionate love. This is where you and your partner are just going crazy for each other. Every smile makes your heart flutter. Every night is more magical than the last. During this phase, your brain floods your neural synapses with dopamine, the same neurotransmitter that gets released when you do cocaine.
Like all drugs, though, this high wears off after 12 to 18 months. At a certain point, the brain rebalances itself. In good relationships, as passionate love fades, companionate love arises to take its place. If passionate love is the cocaine of love, companionate love is like having a glass of wine. In his book The Happiness Hypothesis , NYU social psychologist Jonathan Haidt identifies two danger points in every romantic relationship.
One is at the apex of the passionate-love phase. People get all excited and dive in headfirst. A new couple, weeks or months into a relationship, high off passionate love, goes bonkers and moves in together and gets married way too quickly. Sometimes these couples are able to transition from the passionate stage to the companionate one. The second danger point is when passionate love starts wearing off. This is when you start coming down off that initial high and start worrying about whether this is really the right person for you.
Or: Hey, that dog you made us buy took a dump in my shoe. But Haidt argues that when you hit this stage, you should be patient. With luck, if you allow yourself to invest more in the other person, you will find a beautiful life companion. I had a rather weird firsthand experience with this.
Aziz Ansari’s Modern Romance is a book that uses comedy and statistics to explore the current dating landscape in modern times. The author, Aziz Ansari, is an actor and comedian who Out of stock online. Not available in stores. Summary of Modern Romance: by Aziz Ansari and Eric Klinenberg - Includes Analysis Preview: Modern Romance is a nonfiction book by the At most reputable online dating services (not Tinder), you can filter from race, religion, and spiritual inclination; down to habits, ambitions, and geographical proximity. In fact, according to ... read more
The second danger point is when passionate love starts wearing off. WHICH WAS THE RIGHT CHOICE. Total price:. com and Tinder, have dramatically increased the number of options for people, but having so many choices can be overwhelming. July 5,if the relationship continues, passionate love is replaced with companionate love, which provides safety, security, and comfort. Look, I suck at spelling, but I know for a fact that devices today help a person out with that problem. A few years ago I saw Ansari perform live, during the time he was doing research. I made us aziz ansari online dating book a nice cocktail and we took turns throwing on records while we chatted and laughed. i posted, aziz ansari online dating book, i posted, i posted! The second danger point is when passionate love starts wearing off.